journo-geekery:

US judge orders hundreds of sites “de-indexed” from Google, Facebook

After a series of one-sided hearings, luxury goods maker Chanel has won recent court orders against hundreds of websites trafficking in counterfeit luxury goods. A federal judge in Nevada has agreed that Chanel can seize the domain names in question and transfer them all to US-based registrar GoDaddy. The judge also ordered “all Internet search engines” and “all social media websites”—explicitly naming Facebook, Twitter, Google+, Bing, Yahoo, and Google—to “de-index” the domain names and to remove them from any search results.
The case has been a remarkable one. Concerned about counterfeiting, Chanel has filed a joint suit in Nevada against nearly 700 domain names that appear to have nothing in common. When Chanel finds more names, it simply uses the same case and files new requests for more seizures. (A recent November 14 order went after an additional 228 sites; none had a chance to contest the request until after it was approved and the names had been seized.)

Via Hillary Hartley on G+, where she adds, “Why wait for SOPA?”

Honestly though, I don’t see what’s wrong with this. You’re not supposed to sell counterfeit things. Therefore Chanel has every right to protect their name. 

journo-geekery:

US judge orders hundreds of sites “de-indexed” from Google, Facebook

After a series of one-sided hearings, luxury goods maker Chanel has won recent court orders against hundreds of websites trafficking in counterfeit luxury goods. A federal judge in Nevada has agreed that Chanel can seize the domain names in question and transfer them all to US-based registrar GoDaddy. The judge also ordered “all Internet search engines” and “all social media websites”—explicitly naming Facebook, Twitter, Google+, Bing, Yahoo, and Google—to “de-index” the domain names and to remove them from any search results.

The case has been a remarkable one. Concerned about counterfeiting, Chanel has filed a joint suit in Nevada against nearly 700 domain names that appear to have nothing in common. When Chanel finds more names, it simply uses the same case and files new requests for more seizures. (A recent November 14 order went after an additional 228 sites; none had a chance to contest the request until after it was approved and the names had been seized.)

Via Hillary Hartley on G+, where she adds, “Why wait for SOPA?”

Honestly though, I don’t see what’s wrong with this. You’re not supposed to sell counterfeit things. Therefore Chanel has every right to protect their name. 

(via flymetosaturn)

  1. ducado reblogged this from journo-geekery
  2. becowboy reblogged this from fuckyeahgooglesearch
  3. bernhardt-sofa reblogged this from fuckyeahgooglesearch
  4. sbyrdistheword reblogged this from journo-geekery
  5. contemplativeconfessions reblogged this from journo-geekery
  6. dis-is-whuteva reblogged this from journo-geekery
  7. takemetothecountryside reblogged this from journo-geekery
  8. escalator-wit reblogged this from journo-geekery
  9. ifihadtoparishtwice reblogged this from itsabbynormal
  10. ausetkmt reblogged this from newsweek
  11. extreamis reblogged this from heart4rescue
  12. heart4rescue reblogged this from damselunderstress
  13. pocketsofmyuniverse reblogged this from journo-geekery
  14. enormous-flaws reblogged this from duilliath
  15. sammywhatammy reblogged this from lavitaacolori and added:
    …are you serious? no, really. are you shitting me? the fact that a company can take this kind of complaint to court...
  16. clawtheclouds reblogged this from sassy-gay-url and added:
    I can’t. Like, seriously. What. Words. No words. I am without words. Only rage. Grar.
  17. kiokushitaka reblogged this from youhornysimpletons and added:
    This is ridiculous.
  18. youhornysimpletons reblogged this from sassy-gay-url
  19. sassy-gay-url reblogged this from wasserplane
  20. fuckmaxymaxa reblogged this from nostalgiakeepskickingin
  21. jackieandwonderland reblogged this from anthonyyjamess
  22. thoughtsontharocks reblogged this from journo-geekery
  23. insipidar reblogged this from i-nominavel
  24. passiveyouaggressiveme reblogged this from journo-geekery
  25. dumbldorezarmy reblogged this from wespeakfortheearth
  26. gonorrheawiththewind reblogged this from setbabiesonfire
  27. doctorfurious reblogged this from bemyclosetmonster
  28. spamusubi reblogged this from newsweek
  29. bravelittlenightowl reblogged this from sketchmedesire and added:
    I hope they don’t try to seize my Facebook or Twitter, seeing as my name actually IS Chanel… Haha.
  30. sketchmedesire reblogged this from journo-geekery
  31. phob-phil reblogged this from reeby10 and added:
    This is one of those not-so-rare-times where I have no idea what I am reading. Or I fear what I think this is implying.
  32. king-icon reblogged this from journo-geekery
  33. reeby10 reblogged this from ussawesome
  34. i-nominavel reblogged this from o-r-f-e-u
  35. o-r-f-e-u reblogged this from journo-geekery
  36. shaydonarmstrong reblogged this from newsweek
  37. compozz reblogged this from journo-geekery
"Beauty without intelligence is a masterpiece painted on a napkin."

view archive



My Life.

If you're really bein' a creep...

Who am I?

Q&A